Ye Ol' Comments Page

AksumkA

i tried adding: Simple Simplistic

those are the only two words that wont work, i thought it shouldnt create much of a conflict problem since the other Simplistic title is in Miscellaneous

drgrumbles Nope, no matter where else the tag exists, it can (and should) only exist once. We can move them out of Misc to somewhere more appropriate.

Feel free to report tags that are poorly organized.

marissa Well not all devices in existance were released this year, were they. In fact, among all devices that are currently in use, 1024x768 is still one of the most common resolutions, even ahead of 1920x1080. There are lots of statistics to prove that, e.g. http://gs.statcounter.com/#resolution-ww-monthly-201305-201404

While most of those users will probably not be your typical wallhaven user, I think they deserve the honorable mention. ;D

One more statistics by w3c themselves: http://www.w3counter.com/globalstats.php

According to both statistics, the top ranking appears to be: 1366x768 > 1024x768 > 1280x800 > 1920x1080 > ...

@DaniAlves96 Almost forgot: Not yet, maybe later. However if we do it you'll only see people who have added it to one of their public collections.

As reported by Google Analytics:

1920x1080 1366x768 1920x1200 1680x1050 1600x900 1440x900 1280x1024 1280x800 360x640 1024x768

Gandalf Bringing the who gave you a sub would be nice too.

Lazo That's also planned. I haven't started it yet, but I'm sure it'll be safe to expect that in the next update.

wallpaper Grouping I know you haven't seem to finalized your plans for this yet but could you shed some lights on your current ideas? I'm most interested in if your current plans include child images as well as different sizes of the source image.

quality Control Have you brainstormed something regarding this topic? I see a lot of "1920x1200" wallpapers that are that size in numbers only while the image itself is merely an enlarged image of a smaller size (often horribly small).

Aemony Grouping: As you said there's nothing final. We have a few ideas so far but that's it. In any case we will probably not have 10 different resolutions of the same image.

Quality: There's really nothing we can do about quality from a software point of view. If you see low quality / upscaled wallpapers just report them so a staff member will take a look.

hi, was wondering whether you could kindly move some tags into their respective categories:

so far i have found: red - miscellaneous yellow - miscellaneous blue - miscellaneous

could they please be moved to Miscellaneous -> colour? (or color, depending on how you spell it)

drgrumbles Updated the tags.

If you find any others, give the report tag button a shot, I'll have to add in a wrong category option (could have sworn I did)

One thing that I'd really like is that when you click on a Wallpaper it opens in a new Tab or Window instead of the current one. That'd be great.

AlennTax We have an option for that! Check your Browsing settings

... ... Well, I'll be in the corner over there, feeling stupid.

Well, maybe there could be a better way to show the browsing settings. Maybe in profile drop-down in the upper right corner. Or in a menu or anything else.

Lazo Browsing settings are literally two clicks away at any given time. Settings are prominently placed in the dropdown under your name.

Any news about launching live site? can't wait for it :)

What3ver: we have no ETA for either the beta or the official launch. Currently we won't be going beta until we have essentially all the main features in place, if not ironed out, which means the forum and multi-uploading at least.

Re: tagging standards and requesting changes to tags: tags are in a bit of a state right now because we've not been moderating too much since the databases will be wiped in the (hopefully) near future. Things like subjective tags (e.g. #sexy) won't stay around. The tagging rules we have just now are supposed to cover most bases, but for really specific stuff we'll have the forum to discuss it, like for niche areas like anime.

I know requesting changes via forum posts was a pain on WB, so what we could do (but later on) is have some kind of form people can use to suggest things that staff miss.

Nice feature, taking off NSFW for those not logged in when viewing Random wallpapers. Unless.. that's not a feature?

Necro, Yep. You have to be logged in to view NSFW walls.

This site is great! Just take your time admins, we can wait till it's finished! And have patience everyone else, they are trying hard and working on it, so it's gonna be finished in no time. Untill than, Alpha is just fine. Greets, AngelOfDeath. :)

Me: "My opinion on firearms/guns is that they can be seen widely as a sporting instrument instead of just a weapon, so I would like for them to not be required to be classified as "Sketchy" in some instances (e.g. when a wallpaper is just of a firearm/gun and not killing)."

cfunk: "boonimajneB: that's a good point, but we were thinking in terms of what's appropriate in a workplace, so stuck on the safe side for weaponry. We're also keen to keep the rules simple but effective so that they're easier to follow (as you can see, porn already complicates things). As usual, nothing is set in stone. We expect to tweak things like the different rules once we see how they work out in practice."

Me: Wouldn't it make sense to tag anything sexually suggestive as NSFW (as opposed to SKETCHY) regardless of visible nipples or genitalia?...and keep things like simple wearing of bikinis on a beach which are not sexually SUGGESTIVE but still hold the power to be "sketchy" (in that you see detailed features of a woman's figure).

A bikini would be "... appropriate in a workplace ..." whereas visible genitalia obviously are not but neither should things that have the potential to turn somebody on like a woman pulling her thong or bra down whilst in bed in a seductive position with lace on.

boonimajneB: it would be hard to agree on what's suggestive or arousing, which is why I went for criteria based on what's visible in an image (nipples, etc.) We'll see how it works out compared to WB's policy of making an otherwise SFW image Sketchy if the pose was "suggestive".