Suggestion to improve the Ratios filter - Forums

Ultrawide	16:9	16:10	4:3	5:4
2560 × 1080	1280 × 720	1280 × 800	1280 × 960	1280 × 1024
3440 × 1440	1600 × 900	1600 × 1000	1600 × 1200	1600 × 1280
3840 × 1600	1920 × 1080	1920 × 1200	1920 × 1440	1920 × 1536
	2560 × 1440	2560 × 1600	2560 × 1920	2560 × 2048
	3840 × 2160	3840 × 2400	3840 × 2880	3840 × 3072

Wide	Ultrawide	Portrait	Square
All Wide	All Portrait
16 × 9	21 × 9	9 × 16	1 × 1
16 × 10	32 × 9	10 × 16	3 × 2
	48 × 9	9 × 18	4 × 3
			5 × 4

Hi Wallhaven team,

I’m not sure if this is intentional, but the Ratios filter feels really counterintuitive to me. Could you maybe take a look at it and improve it?

As of 5:00 AM California time (Pacific Time), the total number of images is 1,288,285. When I filter for landscape only, I get 913,242. Portrait only gives 362,352. Square (1x1) only gives 9,722. If I add those up: 913,242 + 362,352 + 9,722 = 1,285,316. That’s 2,969 less than the total (1,288,285). I’m really curious where those 2,969 images went.

Another thing I found interesting: when I keep only landscape and portrait, the count equals the total number of images. So where did the square ones go?

To me, it would make more sense if landscape only showed horizontal images, portrait only showed vertical images, and square/1x1 was its own separate option. Is there any chance you could make the filter work that way?

Thanks for your time!