Should we add color-specific tags in a black and white photo that we know the actual color of?
Background: I'm subscribed to redhead and was just reviewing the latest set of Susan Coffey duplicates to be uploaded when I noticed this in a few of the monochrome photos that were uploaded. We know she has dyed red hair so in a colored photo the tag is relevant(whether or not this is true is subject for another debate). But to an uninformed viewer seeing this by itself, the red hair wouldn't be apparent and so they might think it doesn't belong there.
So to be more specific about my original question:
- Should we apply the color tag to the monochrome picture because the subject is well known to have that color trait? Well known also meaning celebrity status or general public knowledge.
- Should we apply the color tag because the wallpaper was uploaded along with similarly colored ones? Also known as laziness via mass tagging. :P
- Can we apply the color tag to a wallpaper of an obscure subject that only I, the uploader(and maybe a few other people), knows has that color trait, even though I can't/won't upload a similarly colored photo of the subject. Dude, I swear she has red hair. Just trust me, ffs.
- Or should we go by the intended function of tags: to describe and identify a trait found in the specific wallpaper currently being viewed. As found in Rules:
Tags should describe what the image depicts (buildings, sunset) and should not be expressing a view (beautiful, ugly).
It's 2AM so I'm probably over thinking this but I thought it might make for good discussion anyway. Thoughts?

