According to the rules page, one of the definitions of sexual content is "Overly sexual posing: Spread legs, bent over nude, hands on genitals, 'presenting' genitals, stretching/gaping of genitals, etc."
For the past several years I have been reporting wallpapers that feature women (I never see men doing it for whatever reason) "presenting" their vulva and anus to the camera. Sometimes bent over, sometimes on their backs, sometimes viewed from below, etc. In each instance, the subject is clearly "presenting" their genitalia to the camera, the genitals are the primary focus of the image, and they're almost always centered in the image according to the Rule of Thirds. In every single instance, the image was deleted.
However over the past month or so, I've suddenly been getting reports kicked back saying "Actually none of that counts cause her legs are closed together and not spread wide open." (paraphrased) and the image is allowed to stay.
So I was just wondering if this constituted an official change in policy stance, or if there were new moderators/staff operating off their own interpretation of the rules.
Examples of what I'm talking about: https://wallhaven.cc/w/e861lr https://wallhaven.cc/w/7jeq7e https://wallhaven.cc/w/k8l9l7 Legs aren't "spread," but over the past five or so years I've reported dozens of pics exactly like this that were all deleted under the premise of the genitals being "presented" to the camera and being the primary focus of the image.
As opposed to wallpapers like these: https://wallhaven.cc/w/lyj3gr https://wallhaven.cc/w/d8oqkm Where there just happens to be a vagina in the frame but it's not the central focus of the image.