We seriously need more tags

Posts: 15 · Views: 273
  • 17516

    I use sites like Gelbooru and Sankakucomplex and we really need to copy their tag system. Every pic should have at least 10 to 15 tags to be uploaded, and the site needs a tag system to search for multiple tags at once and to exclude certain tags from the search result. Search example: "nature bend_over white_panties -group -topless". This search should lead to only results of pictures that has nature, people bending over with white panties and exclude all pics that has more than one people and topless. This would really make a great upgrade in the site.

  • 17521

    Can you tag this Wall with 15 Tags ?

    loading
    1600 x 120018PNG

  • 17522

    ^ yeah, that's kind of the issue. Personally, I always try to tag with the "would anyone ever search for this tag" mindset (taking into account some subjectively weirder ones too), but for some of the General wallpapers it's just hard to pick... anything more than 2-4.

    I like the idea of searching for multiple tags very much, though (isn't that implemented in some form already, though?).

  • 17523

    We seriously need more... (if not ALL) users to tag their uploads correctly.

  • 17560

    @WallpaperManiac said:

    Can you tag this Wall with 15 Tags ?

    loading
    1600 x 120018PNG

    This simple pic: @WallpaperManiac said:

    Can you tag this Wall with 15 Tags ?

    loading
    1600 x 120018PNG

    This simple pic: has 19 tags. Most pics on sankakucomplex and other booru sites have more than 25 tags. It's just quality. Don't be lazy.

    Added 2018-09-14 05:53:02

    Forgot the link: https://chan.sankakucomplex.com/post/show/7167907

  • 17562

    I would rather have tags that actually describe what is in the wallpaper than a wall of random text. When I see a wallpaper I try to tag it with as many reasonable tags as possible as to allow people to find it should they be searching for something with its characteristics, but when it comes down to it I'm not in the game of mindlessly adding filler tags. I see no point in tagging every single nature post with "green, brown, outdoors, etc." If it's a forest I'll tag it with forest nature and maybe some other descriptive details, but I do not see the point in tag clutter.

  • 17564

    loading
    1920 x 110019
    Ok i try

    1. Black
    2. Dark Black
    3. Bright Black
    4. Artwork
    5. Minimalism
    6. Gradient
    7. Minimalism Artwork
    8. Simple
    9. Boring
    10. Digital Art
    11. Minimalism-Digital-Art
    12. Gradient-Artwork
    13. Silver
    14. Dots
    15. Minimalism-Digital-Art-Artwork
    16. Gradient-Digital-Art
    17. Digital-Art-Black
    18. Digital Art-Silver
    19. Artwork-Artwork
    20. Digital-Art-Simple
    21. Minimalism-Simple-Artwork
    22. Simple-Background
    23. Black Background
    24. One-Color-Background
    25. Dark Background
    26. Silver-Dots
    27. Black-Silver-Minimalism
    28. Black-Silver-Simple-Dots-Digital-Art-Artwork

    Yeah! 28 Tags. At least 24 of them absolute nonsens and useless.

    Next Image we can overtagtag please post.

    Added 2018-09-14 09:59:14

    But seriously, when i post aWall showing a Beach, i don't have to tag every sandcorn on it.

    Added 2018-09-14 10:01:49

    Did you ever think that...

    loading
    2560 x 110913PNG

    and you can't put a Price-Tag on it?

    Last updated
  • 17591

    Awesome!

  • 17593

    And of all that, the first band listed is Moonspell.

    Man of culture.

  • 17597

    OK let's talk about something less extreme 😀

    loading
    1920 x 1080142

    Last updated
  • 17598

    What is the max amount of tags you can tag a wallpaper with?

  • 17600

    @WallpaperManiac said:

    Can you tag this Wall with 15 Tags ?

    loading
    1600 x 120018PNG

    I wouldn't be opposed to reading "leather texture" as an additional tag, because it really looks like a fine (faux) leather surface. Simple as a tag is too general, minimalism however would be fitting. Still not 15, but it can't be that hard thinking about what people might type to get this picture as a result.

    Remember, even if it doesn't fit YOUR definitions of what it is or isn't, it might for other people. I'd rather have too many vaguely fitting results as not enough relevant ones. Not 10 minutes ago I needed to search for six different tags before I found what I was looking for, while I should've been able to find the picture I wanted with the first tag.

    But nitpicking on details is really not the issue we should be focusing on when people fail to tag their uploads with such basic terms like "Asian" or "looking at viewer".

  • 17601

    The point you're missing is that overtagging can be just as annoying when looking for something specific. Searching for a tag that seemed straightforward in your head only to see that about 10% of the results have something to do with what you expected is pretty damn frustrating.

    Great example of that for me is short hair. I'd expect to see women with, you know, short hair. Instead, seriously something like 10% of the results are actually SHORT hair, while most are shoulder length.

    I agree that there are definitely plenty of undertagged wallpapers and there's lots to do in that regard (starting with trying your best with your own uploads, which I do), but overtagging everything to the point of absurdity backfires just as badly.

Message