Banning AI Art

Posts: 329 · Views: 29358
  • 40691

    That image is a real shot by Jerzy Gorecki. Detectors say 95%+ real. The eyes may be misleading, but she is wearing contact lenses that sometimes give a strabismum feeling due to how they reflect light.

  • 40750

    Hitoshirp said:

    It's a bit counterintuitive to ban people who do AI illustrations when there are other solutions! Look at the Pixiv website. It has a general section for everyone and a section for artists where they can sell their illustrations, and AI is prohibited there... there's no need to ban users who use AI. Why don't artists use copyrighted characters on this site? They should be banned too. Only artists who create their own art should remain!

    Absolutely - posting screenshots from games/films is hardly being creative. But hey it's not AI so it's allowed....

  • 40753

    As a newcomer, let me also talk about my own views. I think it is wise to strongly ban art products generated by artificial intelligence! It is extremely unfair to the painter himself that the work he devotes his efforts to create can't be compared with the time of artificial intelligence。Paintings made by artificial intelligence are completely pinched by rigid procedures. If this thing can replace the painstaking efforts of painters, it is really finished, so I agree with a complete ban. I have finished what I have to say

    Added 3 minutes after

    However, after thinking about it, artificial intelligence itself is right. After all, artificial intelligence is still serving people. What is really wrong is that those who take the pictures generated by the program are inferior. People who have a bad impact on the Internet environment, uh... Therefore, my opinion is that the core of the problem is still the user 😧

Message