{"views":["
\"magichands\"<\/a>
magichands<\/a> \u2013 200874<\/a><\/small><\/header>

Trevbloom<\/a> I was following the tagging rules:<\/p>\n

\n

Tags are for categorizing images so users can find them, not needlessly describing them or to show off. Consider how useful a tag is before adding it, and how you would search for the image.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Not every wallpaper that has a depiction of someone with "hips", "legs", or "pale" skin gets those tags, and they aren't the primary subjects of the image.<\/p><\/div><\/article>","

\"Trevbloom\"<\/a>
Trevbloom<\/a> \u2013 200878<\/a><\/small><\/header>

magichands<\/a> We're actually ok with it as long as it applies to the image. The only thing we complain about really is someone having a bunch of non-valid tags applied to images.<\/p><\/div><\/article>","