{"views":["
\"vivi911\"<\/a>
vivi911<\/a> \u2013 193976<\/a><\/small><\/header>

Trevbloom<\/a> was not, or all wallpapers like thit on [https:\/\/wallhaven.cc\/w\/zmzvxy]()[https:\/\/wallhaven.cc\/w\/4gowvq<\/a>]() [https:\/\/wallhaven.cc\/w\/nzvw3j<\/a>]() need to swap on NSFW?<\/p><\/div><\/article>","

\"vivi911\"<\/a>
vivi911<\/a> \u2013 193978<\/a><\/small><\/header>

and all this Nsfw\nhttps:\/\/wallhaven.cc\/w\/3kr7e3<\/a>\nhttps:\/\/wallhaven.cc\/w\/73l3de<\/a>\nhttps:\/\/wallhaven.cc\/w\/5w8vp7<\/a>\nthey ate not " explicit body part was showing and they were still covered even though it seemed censored or they were slighty taking it off. So having it in NSFW is a bit overkill."\nlike u say on ur page.\nshould be more Sketchy like this one https:\/\/wallhaven.cc\/w\/1j3g1g<\/a><\/p>\n

contrary to https:\/\/wallhaven.cc\/w\/96z12d<\/a> this one are more explicit<\/p><\/div><\/article>","

\"vivi911\"<\/a>
vivi911<\/a> \u2013 194034<\/a><\/small><\/header>

Trevbloom<\/a> 4 days without answers, I guess I'm not that wrong.\nif you could remove the conversation, and I will report when I don't know if the tag is suitable or not.\nThank you in advance<\/p><\/div><\/article>","

\"Trevbloom\"<\/a>
Trevbloom<\/a> \u2013 194040<\/a><\/small><\/header>

vivi911<\/a> Sorry, I forgot to reply. For the 3 you gave in the 1st example, I changed them to NSFW. And for the others, I corrected them. Use your better judgement for what you think is the correct purity. We all have different views and I for one, am kinda strict. You can remove the conv yourself now if you want, your choice.<\/p><\/div><\/article>","