{"views":["
\"libraryfire\"<\/a>
libraryfire<\/a> \u2013 193296<\/a><\/small><\/header>

Trevbloom<\/a> I am removing spam tags added by a select few users, some of which aren't even visible on the pictures, like tagging every car wallpaper "licence plates" even where there is none. Refer to the last part of the guidelines... https:\/\/wallhaven.cc\/forums\/thread\/213<\/a><\/p><\/div><\/article>","

\"libraryfire\"<\/a>
libraryfire<\/a> \u2013 193297<\/a><\/small><\/header>

libraryfire<\/a> I started by cleaning the headlights tag like I used to, to keep only wallpapers focusing on them. Please check with other staff first...<\/p><\/div><\/article>","

\"Trevbloom\"<\/a>
Trevbloom<\/a> \u2013 193298<\/a><\/small><\/header>

libraryfire<\/a> I know what you mean, although in my eyes, the wallpaper doesn't have to specifically focus on it solely to merit the tag. like https:\/\/wallhaven.cc\/w\/4769dy<\/a>, I added the tags licence plates, sky and sunlight since for example, I MIGHT remember the image by only those tags or something. It'll only be considered spam if it's not in the image at all. If it's far in the background, all good to add the tag if one sees fit!<\/p><\/div><\/article>","

\"libraryfire\"<\/a>
libraryfire<\/a> \u2013 193299<\/a><\/small><\/header>

Trevbloom<\/a> Do you really need to search "licence plates" when looking for cars? It's not even fully visible in the image you linked. Sure I might be out of date with the site now...<\/p>\n

That wasn't the narrative those few years before. I've even had correct and carefully populated tags of mine deleted before, e.g. when those were created to separate several different car models from different decades. Long hours of contribution wiped on a whim, while other categories of tags did just fine. Thanks for reminding me not to waste my time again, I guess... Cheers<\/p><\/div><\/article>","