{"views":["
\"JARandomP\"<\/a>
JARandomP<\/a> \u2013 184596<\/a><\/small><\/header>

lumberjacck<\/a> If my uploads were low resolution, then what on God's green Earth constitutes something that isn't? I can't see any resolution difference at all between my one undeleted post and the other three.<\/p><\/div><\/article>","

\"JARandomP\"<\/a>
JARandomP<\/a> \u2013 184597<\/a><\/small><\/header>

JARandomP<\/a> Just looked at them again, and two (but not all three) of the deleted images are a bit low quality, and one of them is quite fuzzy, but not the Mikasa image. That one had a tiny little bit of fuzz on the elbows, but that's all I could see.<\/p><\/div><\/article>","

\"JARandomP\"<\/a>
JARandomP<\/a> \u2013 184599<\/a><\/small><\/header>

JARandomP<\/a> Also, several people added my wallpapers to their collections of favourites despite them being "low quality", so clearly they didn't care that they were low quality.<\/p><\/div><\/article>","